Monday, November 12, 2007

This scapegoating is rolling back the gains of anti-racism

Anti-terror stunts and a barrage of propaganda are demonising Muslims and making Islamophobia the acceptable face of racism

Martin Jacques
Thursday February 15, 2007
The Guardian

Predictably enough, the action of the police in last year's Forest Gate raid has been excused with the mildest of rebukes. Out of more than 150 complaints, only a tiny number were upheld. The whole operation, you will recall, was a figment of the security services' imagination. A fortnight ago, there was another spectacular anti-terrorist operation, this time in Birmingham, concerning an alleged plot to kidnap a Muslim member of the armed forces. The pattern of these operations is now well established. The police swoop on an area, make dozens of arrests, accompanied by lurid media reports about the would-be plotters' intentions. There have now been charges, although an innocent party who was arrested and then released has given a disturbing account of his experience in custody. The most alarming example was last summer, when it was alleged there was a plot hatched in Pakistan to blow up as many as 10 aircraft, which resulted in a huge security clampdown at Heathrow and new hand-luggage rules. But, despite a number of charges, a degree of scepticism would be wise, given the experience of cases such as the ricin plot that never was.

Just what are these operations about? You may remember MI5 chief Eliza Manningham-Buller suggested last November that the intelligence services had discovered 30 "plots to kill people and to damage our economy", often with "links back to al-Qaida in Pakistan and through those links al-Qaida gives guidance and training to its largely British foot soldiers here on an extensive and growing scale". The authority for such a statement, I assume, comes from MI5 agents. The quality of such reports, though, must be treated with profound scepticism, dependent as they are on the doubtful calibre and knowledge of these agents and the tendency of such people to live in a semi-fantasy world of endless conspiracy. The fact remains that, notwithstanding the huge security operations and the large numbers arrested, relatively few people have actually been charged. The test of justice is, fortunately, more demanding than the criteria used to justify headlines and political hyperbole.

Of course, we must take terrorist threats seriously - but also the price we pay for these alarums. They magnify our sense of trepidation and persuade people the worst is about to happen: it is under the cloak of such fear that governments on both sides of the Atlantic have been able to impose swingeing restrictions on civil liberties. The fact remains, however, that deaths in the UK from Islamist terrorism have been far fewer than those perpetrated by the IRA. Meanwhile, the price for these constant security operations is paid, above all, by our Muslim communities. Every such operation tars them with the brush of terrorism, an intimation to rest of society that extremism lurks within their ranks.

The scapegoating of the Muslim community has become the stock in trade of politicians, the Conservatives recently accusing the Muslim Council of Britain of separatist tendencies, and New Labour all too frequently indulging in the same kind of refrain - notably during the most disgraceful period of its domestic rule last autumn, when cabinet ministers were falling over themselves to make disparaging remarks about the Muslim community.

The argument typically starts from the global terrorist threat and ends up by suggesting the Muslim community nurtures and sustains such a terrorist mentality by its failure to integrate. Jack Straw squirmed about the veil, Ruth Kelly inveighed against imams, Alan Johnson proposed that faith schools admit up to 25% not of the same faith (patently directed against the Muslim community), and John Reid warned a Muslim audience of "fanatics looking to groom and brainwash [your] children ... for suicide bombing". Amid this panic-inducing rhetoric, there was little acknowledgment that Muslims suffer more discrimination than any other section of society, no recognition that every attack on their community can only intensify that prejudice. Imagine what it feels like to be a Muslim, stalked by a constant sense of distrust and suspicion? As a society we may condemn racism, but when it comes to Muslims, it seems to be somehow acceptable, from the cabinet downwards.

And what is to blame for this failure to integrate? Prejudice, perhaps? Discrimination? Racism? No, according to David Cameron, Ruth Kelly and many others, the cause would appear to be multiculturalism. Pause for a moment and spot the slippage in the argument. It is no longer only about Muslims but all our ethnic minorities. For enshrined in the principle of multiculturalism is the idea that the white community does not insist on the assimilation of ethnic minorities but recognises the importance of pluralism. It is not about separatism but a respect for difference - from colour and dress to customs and religion. The attack on multiculturalism is the thin end of the racism wedge. It seeks to narrow the acceptable boundaries of difference at a time when Britain is becoming ever more diverse and heterogeneous.

None of this is to deny the importance of finding ways of integrating the Muslim community. It is hardly surprising, though, that many young Muslims feel alienated. They face worse discrimination in education and employment than any other ethnic minority, Anglo-American policy in the Middle East has had the effect of demonising the Muslim world, and the Muslim community here finds itself the victim of a barrage of hostile propaganda. A major assault on discrimination involving the government, the media and the Muslim community is long overdue. But while British foreign policy so profoundly discriminates against the Muslim world, and New Labour remains in denial about the connection between domestic Muslim attitudes and its foreign policy, there seems little prospect of making a new start.

Antipathy towards Muslims, meanwhile, threatens to roll back hard-fought anti-racist gains, which, over the decades, have won a degree of respect for ethnic minorities and an acceptance of the principle of difference. These gains have always been fragile. Important ground is now being ceded as Islamophobia becomes the acceptable face of racism and the attack on multiculturalism finds important new recruits.

· Martin Jacques is a visiting research fellow at the Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics.

Dr Bari: Government stoking Muslim tension


  1. Thank you for this. I think so many lefties who embrace the idea of patriotism tippy toe around talking about soldiers being utilized to further capitalist agendas. I think some people also have grands or great grands who were in or who knew people who were in one of the wars. There's a kind of dangerous romanticism that clouds the vision and bids some step lightly. Thanks for stomping instead.

  2. Hi DD, I think you were commenting on the previous article about the hypocrisy of the Red Poppy?

    First, I can't tell you how refreshing it is to have a person of colour commenting on my blog.

    All too often, I get whites whose racism is ill-hidden and obvious making the most preposterous statements.

    It is so sad how so many whites are just so totally brain-washed about their 'superiority' (I wonder how many wash their asses after using the toilet?) that the views they present are so distorted and unreal.

    Yes, the White Poppy Movement was strongest in the late 'thirties when there was a much bigger anti-war movement in Britain then there is now.

    The White Poppy Movement was begun by women. All these so-called lefties of today need to learn a lot from their parents.

    Hundreds of thousands of Muslims fought and died for Britain, only to be treated like Jews in Nazi Germany today.

    I wager you good money: with Bush's America, Britain is turning fascist. In 5-10 years time I won't be allowed to say these things anymore without bein arrested as a "terrorist."

  3. DD, please consider commenting on my blog articles more often. I'm fed up of the pompous white racists.

    Long live Mohammed Shabazz, Malcolm X!

  4. Yeah,
    You're right, I got confused about which comments were for which post. Apologies.

    I worry that the arrests will be starting a lot sooner than that. Everytime I post something particularly scathing I have images of them turning up at my door and either taking me or taking my children because you know radicals don't make good parents.

    And I think people of all ethnicities and political locations on the left should be visiting you a whole lot more. :)

  5. Thanks for the warm invitation. I will definitely return.

  6. Are you in the US or Canada?

    Bush has turned the US into a fascist, police state. Black people always knew that because the way they have been treated. Now it's everyone.

    See how people of colour and Muslims are like the canary in the cage the miners used to take down with them? First whiff of toxic gas and the canary gets it.

    First people of colour, then the Muslims, then the Radicals, then Everybody ... that's the way the Nazis return.

    I sympathize with you because you have children. My boy's grown up now and I have little left but this fight to the death.

    Oh, I do wish more people would read what I say but you have to be thankful for those who do.

    I know that you're a powerful lady so please feel free to consider Chimes of Freedom to be a place for you whenever you wish to visit or comment.

    Maybe there's a way we can work more effectively together?

  7. And there'll always be a heartfelt welcome for you here, my sister!